Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse & Society
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rellstab, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Staging gender online: gender plays in Swiss internet relay chats

Daniel H. Rellstab

UNIVERSITY OF BERN, SWITZERLAND, daniel.rellstab{at}germ.unibe.ch

The relationship between chat and gender is a topic that has been discussed for more than 20 years now. Feminist theorists have claimed that virtual reality effaces gender. Others have pointed to the fact that gender matters online as well as offline; linguists in particular have shown that `real-life' gender leaves traces online in the form of discourse styles and patterns. This article has a somewhat different focus. It analyzes blatant plays with gender in Swiss internet relay chats (IRCs). In these games, chatters make use of gender, and put it on stage. These plays are possible because the construction of the gender in IRCs is achieved almost exclusively by communicative means. They might also be possible because the IRC releases the pressures of social constraints with regard to gender. And they have an effect, which could be described in gender theoretic terms as `queering.' But it has to be observed that these plays are made visible as plays, marked, and temporally limited; afterwards, gender constraints are effective again.

Key Words: conversation analysis • cyber-communities • deconstruction of gender • doing gender • internet relay chat

References

  • Berman, J. and Bruckman, A. (2001) `The Turing Game: Exploring Identity in an Online Environment', Convergence 7(3): 83—102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bittner, J. (2003) Digitalität, Sprache, Kommunikation. Eine Untersuchung zur Medialität von digitalen Kommunikationsformen und Textsorten und deren varietäten linguistischer Modellierung. (Philologische Studien und Quellen 178.) Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
  • Butler, J. (1993) `Critically Queer', Gay and Lesbian Quarterly 1: 17—32.
  • Butler, J. (1997) `Excitable speech.' A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (1999) Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
  • Danet, B. (1995) `Text as Mask: Gender, Play, and Performance on the Internet', in S.G. Jones (ed.) Cybersociety 2.0. Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community (New Media Cultures), pp. 129—58. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Döring, N. (2000) `Identität + Internet = Virtuelle Identität?' forum medienethik 2: 65—75.
  • Döring, N. (2001) `Sozialpsychologische Chat-Forschung: Methoden, Theorien, Befunde', in M. Beißwegner (ed.) Sprache, Interaktion, Sozialität und Identität in synchroner computervermittelter Kommunikation, pp. 141—86. Stuttgart: ibidem.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Gehardt, J. (2001) `Inszenierung und Verortung von Identität in der computervermittelten Kommunikation: Rahmenanalytische Überlegungen am Beispiel des Online-Chat', in kommunikation@gesellschaft, 2. http://www.uni-frankfurt.de/fb03/K.G/B7_2001_Gebhardt.pdf (accessed 3 November 2007).
  • Goffman, E. (1976) `Gender Display', Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 3: 69—77.
  • Hall, K. (1996) `Cyberfeminism', in S. Herring (ed.) Computer-Mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. (Pragmatics and Beyond NS 39), pp. 147—70. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Haschemi Yekani, E. and Michaelis, B. (eds) (2005) Quer durch die GeistesWissenschaften. Perspektiven der Queer Theory. Berlin: Querverlag.
  • Herring, S. (1996a) `Two Variants of an Electronic Message Schema ', in S. Herring (ed.) Computer-Mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. (Pragmatics and Beyond NS 39), pp. 81—106. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Herring, S. (ed.), (1996b) Computer-Mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, (Pragmatics and Beyond NS 39). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Herring, S. (2003) `Gender and Power in Online Communication', in J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds) The Handbook of Language and Gender, pp. 202—28. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Herring, S. and Martinson, A. (2004) `Assessing Gender Authenticity in Computer-mediated Language Use. Evidence from an Identity Game', Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4): 424—46.[Abstract]
  • Huffaker, D.A. and Calvert, S.L. (2005) `Gender, Identity, and Language Use in Teenage Blogs', Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu (accessed 3 November 2007).
  • Kendall, L. (1998) `Are You Male or Female?', in J. O'Brien and J.A. Howard (eds) Everyday Inequalities: Critical Inquiries. London: Blackwell.
  • McIlvenny, P. (2002a) `Critical Reflections on Performativity and the "Un/Doing" of Gender and Sexuality in Talk', in P. McIlvenny (ed.) Talking Gender and Sexuality (Pragmatics and Beyond NS 94), pp. 111—49. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • McIlvenny, P. (ed.) (2002b) Talking Gender and Sexuality (Pragmatics and Beyond NS 94). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • O'Brien, J. (1999) `Writing in the Body. Gender (Re)production in Online Interaction', in M.A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 76—104. New York: Routledge.
  • Panyametheekul, S. and Herring, S. (2003) `Gender and Turn Allocation in a Thai Chat Room ', Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(1), available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu (accessed 3 November 2007).
  • Rellstab,D.H.( 2006)` RüpplestattSchwüpple—Genderplayimhip-hop',in C. Dürscheid and J. Spitzmüller (eds) Perspektiven der Jugendsprachforschung ( Sprache — Kommunikation — Kultur 3), pp. 201—26. Frankfurt: Lang.
  • Savicki, V. (1996) `Gender, Language Style, and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups', Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2(3), available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu (accessed 3 November 2007).
  • Schegloff, E.A. (1997) `Whose Text? Whose Context?', Discourse & Society 8: 165—87.[Abstract]
  • Schegloff, E.A. (1998) `Reply to Wetherell', Discourse & Society 9: 413—16.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Schönfeld, J. (2001) `Die Gesprächsorganisation in der Chat-Kommunikation ', in M. Beißwenger (ed.) Sprache, Interaktion, Sozialität and Identität in synchroner computervermittelter Kommunikation. Perspektiven auf ein interdisziplinäres Forschungsfeld, pp. 25—53. Stuttgart: ibidem.
  • Suler, J.R. (2004) `Do Boys (and Girls) Just Wanna Have Fun?', in A. Kunkel (ed.) Gender Communication, pp. 149—52. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.
  • Sullivan, N. (2003) A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. New York: New York University Press.
  • ten Have, P. (2000) Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. London: SAGE. Thomson, R. and Murachver, T. (2001) `Predicting Gender from Electronic Discourse', British Journal of Social Psychology 40: 193—208.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Van Gelder, L. (1996) `The Strange Case of the Electronic Lover', in R. Kling (ed.) Computerization and Controversy. Value Conflicts and Social Choices (2nd edn), pp. 533—47. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • West, C. and Fenstermaker, S. (1995) `Doing Difference', Gender and Society 9(1): 8—37.[CrossRef]
  • West, C. and Zimmerman, D.H. (1987) `Doing Gender', Gender and Society 1(2): 125—51.[CrossRef]

Discourse & Society, Vol. 18, No. 6, 765-787 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926507082195


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rellstab, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?