Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse & Society
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murata, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pro- and anti-whaling discourses in British and Japanese newspaper reports in comparison: a cross-cultural perspective

Kumiko Murata

WASEDA UNIVERSITY, JAPAN, murata{at}waseda.ja

This article compares and contrasts the discourse of whaling in British and Japanese newspaper reports. It investigates the ways in which pro- and anti-whaling discourses are formulated in the press by examining, in particular, the following features: (1) the use of specific lexis and syntactic structures, (2) the use of rhetorical devices, and (3) the control and organization of information at a discourse level. The article claims that British and Japanese news reports use very different strategies in expressing their anti- and pro-whaling stances; the former tend to use a more emotive and provocative tone, whereas the latter use a more restrained and factual tone. The article also claims that the issue of whaling tends to be discussed under different cultural assumptions and values in the respective discourses; and thus, suggests the possibility that readers may be influenced by the cumulative effects of these different discourses.

Key Words: critical discourse analysis • cross-cultural communication • ecology • English and Japanese • neWs discourse • Whaling • Written discourse

References

  • Aron, W., Burke, W. and Freeman, M. (1999) `Flouting the Convention', The Atlantic Monthly 283(5): 22—9.
  • Bell, A. (1984) `Language Style as Audience Design', Language in Society 13: 145—204.[Web of Science]
  • Bell, A. (1991) The Language of NeWs Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Bell, A. (1998) `The Discourse Structures of News Stories', in A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds) Approaches to Media Discourse, pp. 64—104. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Bell, A. (2000) `Language as Dialogue: Bakhtin and Sociolingistic Theory', Keynote speech delivered at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000 at the University of the West of England, 29 April.
  • Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Cooper-Chen, A. (1997) Mass Communication in Japan. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
  • Eagleton, T. (1991) Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
  • Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and PoWer. London: Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Fairclough, N. (1995a) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. (1995b) Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
  • Fairclough, N. (1998) `Political Discourse in the Media: An Analytical Framework', in A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds) Approaches to Media Discourse, pp. 142—62. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Fairclough, N. (2000) NeW Labour, NeW Language? London: Routledge.
  • Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge.
  • Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) `Critical Discourse Analysis', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 258—84. London: SAGE.
  • Fowler, R. (1991) Language in the NeWs: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
  • Fowler, R. (1996) `On Critical Linguistics', in C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices, pp. 3—14. London: Routledge.
  • Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (eds) (1979) Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Freeman, L.A. (2000) Closing the Shop: Information Cartels and Japan's Mass Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Garrett, P. and Bell, A. (1998) `Media and Discourse: A Critical Overview', in A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds) Approaches to Media Discourse, pp. 1—20. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Gramsci, A. (1985) Selections from Cultural Writings. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn). London: Arnold.
  • Hinds, J. (1983) `Contrastive Rhetoric: Japanese and English', Text 3(2): 183—95.
  • Hinds, J. (1990) `Inductive, Deductive, Quasi-inductive: Expository Writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese and Thai', in U. Connor and A.M. Johns (eds) Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspective, pp. 87—109. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
  • Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1993) Language as Ideology (2nd edn). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Howard, I. and Niyekawa-Howard, A.M. (1976) `Passivization', in M. Shibatani (ed.) Syntax and Semantics Vol. 5: Japanese Generative Grammar, pp. 201—37. New York: Academic Press.
  • Inase, T. (1998) Shimbun ga omoshiroku nai riyuu. Tokyo: Kodansha.
  • International Whaling Commission (1946 [2000]) `The Text of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, 1946', available at: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/iwcoffice/Convention.htm
  • International Whaling Commission (2000) Final Press Release, 2000 Annual Meeting.
  • Joseph, J. (1993) The Japanese. London: Viking.
  • Kubota, R. (1998) `Ideologies of English in Japan', World Englishes 7(3): 295—306.
  • Leach, E. (1964) `Anthropological Aspects of Language: Animal Categories and Verbal Abuse', in E.R. Lennerberg (ed.), NeW Directions in the Study of Language, pp. 23—63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Leech, G.N. and Short, M.H. (1981) Style in Fiction. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
  • Masuoka, T., Nitta, Y., Gunji, T. and Kinsui, S. (1997) IWanami Kooza, Gengo no Kagauku (Linguistic Sciences) 5, Bumpoo. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
  • Maynard, S.K. (1998) Principles of Japanese Discourse: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Morita, K. (1994) kujira to hogei no bunka-shi. Nagoya: Nagoya University Press.
  • Murata, K. (2001, March) `The Discourses of Anti- and Pro-whaling in the British and the Japanese Press: A Comparative Cultural Perspective ', Paper presented at the Language, the Media and International Communication Conference, Oxford.
  • Murata, K. (2004) `News Discourse and its Influence on Readers', The Journal of Asia TEFL 1(1): 243—66.
  • Murata, K. (2007) `Unanswered Questions: Cultural Assumptions in Text Interpretation', International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17(1): 38—59.[CrossRef]
  • Murata, K. (forthcoming) `The Discourses of Pro- and Anti-whaling in British and Japanese News Editorials: A Comparative Cultural Perspective', in G. Garzone and C. Ilie (eds) The Role of English in Institutional and Business Settings: An Intercultural Perspective. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
  • The Nihon Shinbun Kyokai (The Japan Newspaper Publishers and Editors Association) http://www.pressnet.or.jp/info/
  • O'Halloran, K. (2003) Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Pennycook, A. (1998) English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.
  • Pharr, S.J. (1996) `Media as Trickster in Japan: A Comparative Perspective ', in S.J. Pharr and E.S. Krauss (eds) Media and Politics in Japan, pp. 19—43. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Said, E.W. (1978) Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin.
  • Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.W. (2001) Intercultural Communication (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Shibayama, T. (1997) Nihon-gata media shisutem no hookai: 21-seiki jyaanarizumu no shinka-ron. Tokyo: Kashiwa Shobo.
  • Simpson, P. (1993) Language, Ideology and Point of VieW. London: Routledge.
  • Stubbs, M. (1994) `Grammar, Text, and I: Computer-assisted Methods in the Linguistics of Representation', Applied Linguistics 15(2): 201—23.[Abstract]
  • Stubbs, M. (1996) Texts and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Stubbs, M. (1997) `Whorf 's Children: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)', in A. Ryan and A. Wray (eds) Evolving Models of Language, pp. 100—16. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Taife, D. (2000) `Balance of Nature with Regard to Whales', available at: www.jpwhaling-assn.com/media_releases
  • Tatoh, S. (1985) hogei no rekishi to shiryo. Tokyo: Suisan-sha.
  • Teramura, H. (1982) Nihon-go no shintakkus to imi, dai 1-kan. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.
  • Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. and Vetter, E. (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
  • Toolan, M. (1997) `What is Critical Discourse Analysis and Why are People Saying Such Terrible Things About It?', Language and Literature 6(2): 83—103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Trew, T. (1979) `Theory and Ideology at Work', in R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress and T. Trew (eds) Language and Control, pp. 94—116. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Uda, C. ( 1994) Complex Predicates in Japanese. New York: Garland.
  • Van Dijk, T.A. (1988) NeWs as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Van Dijk, T.A. (1993) Elite Discourse and Racism. London: SAGE.
  • Van Dijk, T.A. (1996) `Discourse, Power and Access', in C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices, pp. 84—104. London: Routledge.
  • Van Dijk, T.A. (1998) `Opinions and Ideologies in the Press', in A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds) Approaches to Media Discourse, pp. 21—63. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Van Dijk, T.A. (2001) `Critical Discourse Analysis', in D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H.E. Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 352—71. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Widdowson, H.G. (1993) `Representations in Prose: Setting the Scene', in J.M. Sinclair, M. Hoey and G. Fox (eds) Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse, pp. 143—53. London: Routledge.
  • Widdowson, H.G. (1995a) `Discourse Analysis: A Critical View', Lanaguage and Literature 4(3): 157—72.[CrossRef]
  • Widdowson, H.G. (1995b) `Norman Fairclough: Discourse and Social Change ', Applied Linguistics 16(4): 510—16.[Web of Science]
  • Widdowson, H.G. (1996) `Reply to Fairclough: Discourse and Interpretation: Conjectures and Refutations', Language and Literature 5(1): 57—69.[Free Full Text]
  • Widdowson, H.G. (1997) `The Use of Grammar, the Grammar of Use', Functions of Language 4(2): 145—68.
  • Widdowson, H.G. (1998) `Review Article: The Theory and Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis', Applied Linguistics 19(1): 136—51.
  • Widdowson, H.G. (2000a) `On the Limitations of Linguistics Applied', Applied Linguistics 21(1): 3—25.[Abstract]
  • Widdowson, H.G. (2000b) `Critical Practices: On Representation and the Interpretation of Text', in S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard (eds) Discourse and Social Life, pp. 155—69. Harlow, UK: Longman.
  • Widdowson, H.G. (2004) Text, Context, Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wodak, R. (2001a) `What CDA is About — A Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments', in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 1—13. London: SAGE.
  • Wodak, R. (2001b) `The Discourse-Historical Approach', in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 63—94. London: SAGE.
  • Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds) (2001) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.

Discourse & Society, Vol. 18, No. 6, 741-764 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926507082194


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
J. Hakam
The `cartoons controversy': a Critical Discourse Analysis of English-language Arab newspaper discourse
Discourse Society, January 1, 2009; 20(1): 33 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murata, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?