This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lillian, D. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A thorn by any other name: sexist discourse as hate speech

EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY, USA, lilliand{at}ecu.edu

Scholarship on hate speech usually addresses racist and ethnicist discourses, and less often homophobic discourses. This article opens a conversation about sexist discourse as hate speech. In arguing that sexist discourse should be considered hate speech, I review several definitions of hate speech, one of which I use in analyzing the texts of neoconservative author William D. Gairdner. I argue that, although Gairdner's sexist discourse does not meet the legal definitions of hate speech, it is consistent with linguistic criteria for hate speech and that, since Gairdner's discourse is representative of mainstream sexist discourse, all such sexist discourse counts as hate speech. I conclude by asking why, amid all the published works on hate speech, the question of sexist discourse as hate speech is rarely even addressed. Since society still operates as if `male' and `female' were simple, self-evident categories, we, as feminists, must still respond to and challenge the sexist discourses that perpetuate and reproduce such dichotomies. One way to do that is to recognize sexist discourse as a form of hate speech and to challenge it on that basis.

Key Words: Canada • critical discourse analysis • feminism • hate speech • sexism

References

• Allen, D.S. and Jensen, R. (1995) Freeing the First Amendment: Critical Perspectives on Freedom of Expression. New York: New York University Press.
• Burton, D. (1982) `Through Glass Darkly: Through Dark Glasses: On Stylistics and Political Commitment — Via a Study of a Passage from Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar', in R. Carter (ed.) Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics, pp. 195—214. London: Allen and Unwin.
• Dobbin, M. (1992) Preston Manning and the Reform Party. Halifax, Canada: Formac.
• Downing, J.D.H. (1999) `"Hate Speech" and "First Amendment Absolutism" Discourses in the US', Discourse & Society 10(2): 175—89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Ehrlich, S. and King, R. (1992) `Gender-based Language Reform and the Social Construction of Meaning', Discourse & Society 3: 151—66.[Abstract]
• Ehrlich, S. and King, R. (1994) `Feminist Meanings and the (De)politicization of the Lexicon', Language in Society 23: 59—76.[Web of Science]
• Ehrlich, S. and King, R. (1998) `Gender-based Language Reform and the (De)Politicization of the Lexicon', in J. Cheshire and P. Trudgill (eds) The Sociolinguistics Reader Vol. 2: Gender and Discourse, pp. 178—94. London: Arnold.
• Fowler, R. (1985) `Power', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 4, pp. 61—84. London: Academic Press.
• Friedan, B. (1963) The Feminine Mystique. New York: Dell.
• Gairdner, W.D. (1990) The Trouble With Canada: A Citizen Speaks Out. Toronto: Stoddart.
• Gairdner, W.D. (1992) The War Against the Family: A Parent Speaks Out. Toronto: Stoddart.
• Gairdner, W.D. (1994) Constitutional Crackup: Canada and the Coming ShoWdoWn With Quebec. Toronto: Stoddart.
• Gairdner, W.D. (1996) On Higher Ground: Reclaiming a Civil Society. Toronto: Stoddart.
• Gairdner, W.D. (ed.) (1998) After Liberalism: Essays in Search of Freedom, Virtue, and Order. Toronto: Stoddart.
• Gairdner, W.D. (2001) The Trouble With Democracy: A Citizen Speaks Out. Toronto: Stoddart.
• Gairdner, W.D., Ajzenstat, J., Romney, P. and Gentles, I. (eds) (1999) Canada's Founding Debates. Toronto: Stoddart.
• Haiman, F.S. (1993) `Speech Acts' and the First Amendment. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Harrison, T. (1995) Of Passionate Intensity: Right-Wing Populism and the Reform Party of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Jeffrey, B. (1999) Hard Right Turn: The NeW Face of Neo-Conservatism in Canada. Toronto: Harper Collins.
• King, R. (1991) Talking Gender: A Guide to Nonsexist Communication. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman.
• Kulick, D. (2003) `No', Language and Communication 23: 139—51.[CrossRef]
• Lakoff, G. (1996) Moral Discourse: What Conservatives KnoW that Liberals Don't. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lillian, D.L. (1997) `Transitivity as an Ideological Tool: The Discourse of William D. Gairdner', Papers from the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association, pp. 122—31. Halifax, Nova Scotia.
• Lillian, D.L. (2001) `Canadian Neoconservative Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis', unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, Toronto.
• Lillian, D.L. (2005) `Homophobic Discourse: A "Popular" Canadian Example', SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 119—44.
• Lillian, D.L. (forthcoming) `Neoconservative Racist Discourse: A Canadian Case Study ', WORD 57(1).
• Mills, S. (1995) Feminist Stylistics. London: Routledge.
• Mills, S. (1998) `Post-feminist Text Analysis', Language and Literature 7(3): 235—53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Reddy, V. (2002) `Perverts and Sodomites: Homophobia as Hate Speech in Africa', Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 20: 163—75.
• Riggins, S.H. (ed.) (1997) The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse. London: SAGE.
• Simpson, P. (1993) Language, Ideology and Point of VieW. New York: Routledge.
• Sykes, M. (1985) `Discrimination in Discourse', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 4, pp. 83—102. London: Academic Press.
• Tsesis, A. (2002) Destructive Messages: HoW Hate Speech Paves the Way for Harmful Social Movements. New York: New York University Press.
• Van Dijk, T.A. (1997) `Political Discourse and Racism: Describing Others in Western Parliaments', in S.H. Riggins (ed.) The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, pp. 31—64. London: SAGE.
• Walker, S. (1994) Hate Speech: The History of an American Controversy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
• Whillock, R.K. (1995) `The Use of Hate as a Stratagem for Achieving Political and Social Goals', in R.K. Whillock and D. Slayden (eds) Hate Speech, pp. 28—54. London: SAGE.
• Whillock, R.K. and Slayden, D. (eds) (1995) Hate Speech. London: SAGE.

Discourse & Society, Vol. 18, No. 6, 719-740 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926507082193


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lillian, D. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?