Discourse & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stokoe, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Discourse & Society, Vol. 9, No. 2, 217-240 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926598009002005

Talking about Gender: The Conversational Construction of Gender Categories in Academic Discourse

Elizabeth H. Stokoe

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY

The paper explores the nature of academic discourse, paying particular attention to the construction of gender categories within students' conversations. A different approach to the investigation of the links between language and gender is taken to that adopted in previous research in the area. Rather than attempting to define gender differences in talk, or to characterize the interactional styles of men and women, or to explore how gender is `done' in interaction, a discursive conversation analytic approach is taken in order to explore the ways in which participants themselves talk about gender. Small groups of three to four undergraduate and postgraduate students were video-recorded during seminar/tutorial sessions. The data were transcribed and analysed. How `gender', as a societal category, is occasioned in the discussions is illustrated, along with the possible effects on the task execution.

Key Words: academic discourse • conversation analysis • gender


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
A. C. Ostermann
Communities of Practice at Work: Gender, Facework and the Power of Habitus at an All-Female Police Station and a Feminist Crisis Intervention Center in Brazil
Discourse Society, July 1, 2003; 14(4): 473 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
E. H. STOKOE and J. SMITHSON
Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction
Discourse Society, March 1, 2001; 12(2): 217 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
S. A. Speer
Reconsidering the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: Discursive Psychology, Conversation Analysis and Participants' Orientations
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 2001; 11(1): 107 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
K. Stapleton
I. In Search of the Self: Feminism, Postmodernism and Identity
Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2000; 10(4): 463 - 469.
[PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
E. H. Stokoe
IV. Toward a Conversation Analytic Approach to Gender and Discourse
Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2000; 10(4): 552 - 563.
[PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
C. Kitzinger
Doing Feminist Conversation Analysis
Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2000; 10(2): 163 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
C. KITZINGER and H. FRITH
Just Say No? The Use of Conversation Analysis in Developing a Feminist Perspective on Sexual Refusal
Discourse Society, July 1, 1999; 10(3): 293 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]