This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Swales, J. M. Articles by Rogers, P. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Discourse and the Projection of Corporate Culture: The Mission Statement

ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Priscilla S. Rogers

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

This article explores how corporations project their corporate philosophy through `Mission Statements'. Linguistic and textual analysis of such statements drawn from a sizeable corpus allows us to typify the texts as constituting a non-routine, organizational genre, and one that has recently become of some significance. This discussion serves as a foundation for a contextual and intertextual analysis (cf. Fairclough, 1992) of Mission Statements from two well-known US companies. By detailing the history, rationale and role of these Mission Statements we indicate how the texts are rhetorically designed in order to ensure maximum employee `buy-in'. Despite linguistic and rhetorical similarities among the texts, an exploration of context reveals startling differences in communicative purpose. In one case the Mission Statement emerges as an empowering historical vision to be protected and nurtured through all vicissitudes; in the other case, the rewriting of the Mission Statement emerges as a collaborative response to crisis. The article ends by discussing the implications of such findings for contemporary approaches to discourse and genre analysis within institutional linguistics.

Key Words: business communication • corporate culture • discourse analysis • genre studies • ideology • Mission Statements

Discourse & Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, 223-242 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926595006002005


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Stallworth Williams The Mission Statement: A Corporate Reporting Tool With a Past, Present, and Future Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 94 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Lassen Is the press release a genre? A study of form and content Discourse Studies, August 1, 2006; 8(4): 503 - 530. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. S. Rogers and S. M. Lee-Wong Reconceptualizing Politeness to Accommodate Dynamic Tensions in Subordinate-to-Superior Reporting Journal of Business and Technical Communication, October 1, 2003; 17(4): 379 - 412. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. C. Schroder Making sense of audience discourses: Towards a multidimensional model of mass media reception European Journal of Cultural Studies, May 1, 2000; 3(2): 233 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Connell and D. Galasinski Academic Mission Statements: An Exercise in Negotiation Discourse Society, October 1, 1998; 9(4): 457 - 479. [Abstract]

				S. Tannock Positioning the Worker: Discursive Practice in a Workplace Literacy Program Discourse Society, January 1, 1997; 8(1): 85 - 116. [Abstract]

				P. S. Rogers Disciplinary Distinction or Responsibility? Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1996; 10(1): 112 - 123.

				C. Antaki and M. Rapley `Quality of Life' Talk: The Liberal Paradox of Psychological Testing Discourse Society, July 1, 1996; 7(3): 293 - 316. [Abstract]