This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Biryukov, N. Articles by Sergeyev, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Crisis of Sobornost': Parliamentary Discourse in Present-Day Russia

MOSCOW STATE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Jeffrey Gleisner

UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS

Victor Sergeyev

RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

Russian political culture has always rejected parliamentarianism. Following the collapse of the Soviet regime, this culture is now in crisis. Is it likely to be more favorable to parliamentarianism after the crisis is over? The paper seeks to answer this question by analysing recent trends in the mentality of the Russian political elite. These are identified through the use of `pseudo-agencies' as characteristic of the traditional Russian/Soviet political discourse. Special semantic methods are employed to distinguish between `authentic political agencies' and `pseudo-agencies' in the verbatim records of the Ninth Congress of People's Deputies (March 1993) which constitute the empirical base of the study. The findings are used to range the various political forces according to the degree of deviation from the traditional ontological patterns.

Key Words: authentic and pseudo-agencies • cognitive maps • Ninth Congress of People's Deputies (the Russian Federation) • political culture • populist rhetoric • sobornost' • socio-ontological models

Discourse & Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, 149-175 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926595006002002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?