This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rojo, L. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Division and Rejection: From the Personification of the Gulf Conflict to the Demonization of Saddam Hussein

UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID

This paper analyses the process of exclusion of Saddam Hussein, in a Spanish newspaper, El País, in the period just before the Gulf War. This exclusion procedure is articulated on two axes: division and rejection (Foucault, 1964). `Division' means establishing an inclusive us and an exclusive them, in this case, him. This move therefore entails a personification of the conflict, which produces immediate feelings of identification or rejection, and simplifies how the war is understood. Both effects are reinforced by the second move of the exclusion procedure: `rejection'. Once the two camps are established an imaginary dimension, related to the ideology of consensus and ethnic prejudices, is evoked in order to create an image of Saddam Hussein in which he plays the stranger, the irrational being, the madman, the beast and, ultimately, the personification of evil. These are the villain's attributes in the fairy tale of the just war (Lakoff, 1992), which is the script of the event activated by the newspaper for the conceptualization of the conflict and its protagonists. On the other hand, a positive image is created for a unique and ideological us, in which, as readers, we are included and absorbed.

Key Words: demonization • discourse strategies • division and rejection moves • ethnic prejudices • exclusion procedures • ideology of consensus • imaginary dimension • linguistic and argumentative resources • madness • personification

Discourse & Society, Vol. 6, No. 1, 49-80 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926595006001004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Achugar The Events and Actors of 11 September 2001 As Seen from Uruguay: Analysis of Daily Newspaper Editorials Discourse Society, May 1, 2004; 15(2-3): 291 - 320. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. STAMOU The Representation of Non-Protesters in a Student and Teacher Protest: A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting in a Greek Newspaper Discourse Society, September 1, 2001; 12(5): 653 - 680. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. THETELA Critique Discourses and Ideology in Newspaper Reports: A Discourse Analysis of the South African Press Reports on the 1998 SADC's Military Intervention in Lesotho Discourse Society, May 1, 2001; 12(3): 347 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]