| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0957926595006001006 © 1995 SAGE Publications Women's Competence in ConversationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA In this paper, my aim is to review the logic involved in existing assessments of women's competence as conversationalists. My point of departure is the very definition of competence, which, as I demonstrate, has not been employed in many descriptions of women's deficits. Instead, conversational competence has been generally defined by default, in relation to how men speak and what men mean to say. By contrast, conversation analysis yields a systematic means of assessing the demands that conversation makes on conversationalists and the efforts needed to meet them. To advance this approach, I examine the results of existing research that show women's skills at listening, at effecting smooth transitions between speakers, and at maintaining accord in task-oriented, as well as casual, conversations. This examination leads me to consider how women's conversational competence has been misrepresented in many existing assessmentsand to consider how such misrepresentation is involved in the subordination of women by men.
Key Words: conversation analysis conversational competence language and gender listening skills men politeness speaking skills women
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

