Discourse & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Discourse & Society, Vol. 6, No. 1, 107-131 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926595006001006
© 1995 SAGE Publications

Women's Competence in Conversation

Candace West

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

In this paper, my aim is to review the logic involved in existing assessments of women's competence as conversationalists. My point of departure is the very definition of competence, which, as I demonstrate, has not been employed in many descriptions of women's deficits. Instead, conversational competence has been generally defined by default, in relation to how men speak and what men mean to say. By contrast, conversation analysis yields a systematic means of assessing the demands that conversation makes on conversationalists and the efforts needed to meet them. To advance this approach, I examine the results of existing research that show women's skills at listening, at effecting smooth transitions between speakers, and at maintaining accord in task-oriented, as well as casual, conversations. This examination leads me to consider how women's conversational competence has been misrepresented in many existing assessments—and to consider how such misrepresentation is involved in the subordination of women by men.

Key Words: conversation analysis • conversational competence • language and gender • listening skills • men • politeness • speaking skills • women


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
E. H. STOKOE and J. SMITHSON
Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction
Discourse Society, March 1, 2001; 12(2): 217 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
E. H. Stokoe
IV. Toward a Conversation Analytic Approach to Gender and Discourse
Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2000; 10(4): 552 - 563.
[PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
E. H. Stokoe
Talking about Gender: The Conversational Construction of Gender Categories in Academic Discourse
Discourse Society, April 1, 1998; 9(2): 217 - 240.
[Abstract]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
V. L. Bergvall and K. A. Remlinger
Reproduction, Resistance and Gender in Educational Discourse: The Role of Critical Discourse Analysis
Discourse Society, October 1, 1996; 7(4): 453 - 479.
[Abstract]