Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastie, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘Excusing the inexcusable’: justifying injustice in Nelson’s Sorry speech

Brianne Hastie

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, Brianne.Hastie{at}unisa.edu.au

Political discourses reflect and shape public constructions of past and present events, and social ‘problems’. This article examines how Australia’s Opposition Leader, Brendan Nelson, worked to undermine the attempted reconstruction of the past by the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, through a political apology designed to recognize injustice and reframe the ‘problem’ of Indigenous Australians. This is achieved through two strategies: (1) mitigating blame of those involved in removal of children; and (2) ascribing blame for the current circumstances of some Indigenous peoples to recent events. A number of discursive strategies are drawn upon to accomplish this, allowing Nelson to be seen to apologize, while at the same time justifying the injustices experienced by Indigenous peoples in the past and the present. This research adds to our knowledge of the ways in which resistance to redefinitions of the past are accomplished, by denying Indigenous peoples’ sovereignty and excluding explanations for current disadvantage grounded in the ongoing colonial project.

Key Words: apology • blame • discursive psychology • political rhetoric • race

Discourse & Society, Vol. 20, No. 6, 705-725 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926509342366


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?