Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Speer, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gatekeeping gender: some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients

Susan A. Speer

Manchester University

Ceri Parsons

Staffordshire University

Psychiatrists, like other medical professionals with a diagnosing or prescribing role, control access to a range of forms of treatment, medication and service that their patient, or their patient’s carer, may want access to. In this article, we explore psychiatrist-patient interactions in the distinctive institutional site of a UK NHS Gender Identity Clinic, where the psychiatrist’s gatekeeping role is renowned. We focus on some interactional features of the psychiatrist’s gatekeeping role as it gets played out and oriented to in a specific class of question that they ask their patients. This class of questions involves the psychiatrist putting to the patient a possible future hypothetical scenario where the patient’s treatment is withdrawn. We show how these hypothetical questions function in the psychiatric assessment of transsexuals, and how the psychiatrist’s institutional, gatekeeping role is made manifest both in the design of the hypothetical question and in the response that is elicited from the patient. We end by considering the extent to which hypothetical questions may be deemed a ‘useful’ or a ‘successful’ strategy in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients.

Key Words: gender identity • hypothetical questions • medical interaction • psychiatry • transsexualism

Discourse & Society, Vol. 17, No. 6, 785-812 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926506068433


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. Ziolkowska
Positions in Doctors' Questions During Psychiatric Interviews
Qual Health Res, November 1, 2009; 19(11): 1621 - 1631.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
M. Noordegraaf, C. van Nijnatten, and E. Elbers
Assessing suitability for adoptive parenthood: hypothetical questions as part of ongoing conversation
Discourse Studies, October 1, 2008; 10(5): 655 - 672.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
M. Noordegraaf, C. van Nijnatten, and E. Elbers
Future Talk: Discussing Hypothetical Situations with Prospective Adoptive Parents
Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2008; 7(3): 310 - 329.
[Abstract] [PDF]