This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tilbury, F. Articles by Colic-Peisker, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Deflecting responsibility in employer talk about race discrimination

Murdoch University, Australia

Val Colic-Peisker

Murdoch University, Australia

This article explores a number of discursive devices used by employers when talking about employment market issues for migrants in Australia. Data come from a research project which sought to understand barriers to employment for ‘visibly different’ refugees and new migrants. Analysis reveals that employers use a number of rhetorical strategies, embedded within broader racist discourses, to deflect attention from their own possible culpability in discriminating against those from migrant and refugee backgrounds. The forms these ‘exoneration utterances’ take are examined in detail. Employers attribute inequitable employment outcomes to the market, their customers or clients, the community and to the applicants themselves, absolving themselves, and the companies they represent, of responsibility.

Key Words: critical discourse analysis • employment • migrants • racism • refugees • responsibility

Discourse & Society, Vol. 17, No. 5, 651-676 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926506066349


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?