Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Discourse & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Questions and the exercise of power

Jinjun Wang

YUNNAN UNIVERSITY, jjwangkm{at}yahoo.com.cn

This article argues that ‘ideal dialogue’, which is free from power, is unattainable and unrealistic, and power is inherent in all dialogues. It focuses on the exploration of questions as a possible means to exercise power in both casual conversation and institutional dialogue. Comparatively speaking, power tends to be overt in institutional dialogue and covert in casual conversation and questions exercise power in different ways in both forms of verbal interaction respectively. On the basis of data analysis, it is pointed out that the immediate allocation of turn-taking and the temporary topic control result in the latency of questions as a powerful means in casual conversation. The prominence of questions as a powerful means centers on three factors, that is, notably unequal distribution of questions producing the unequal allocation of turn-taking, dominant questions controlling both local and global topics, and Yes/No questions and Wh-questions exercising power in different degrees.

Key Words: dialogues • exercise of power • power • questions

Discourse & Society, Vol. 17, No. 4, 529-548 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926506063127


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATIONHome page
S.-Y. Chiang
Personal power and positional power in a power-full `I': a discourse analysis of doctoral dissertation supervision
Discourse & Communication, August 1, 2009; 3(3): 255 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
K. Tracy and J. Robles
Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction
Discourse Studies, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 131 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
M. Bartesaghi
Conversation and psychotherapy: how questioning reveals institutional answers
Discourse Studies, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 153 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
T. Castor
`It's just a process': questioning in the construction of a university crisis
Discourse Studies, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 179 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]