This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by van Dijk, T. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Discourse and manipulation

UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA, BARCELONA

‘Manipulation’ is one of the crucial notions of Critical Discourse Analysis that require further theoretical analysis. This article offers a triangulated approach to manipulation as a form of social power abuse, cognitive mind control and discursive interaction. Socially, manipulation is defined as illegitimate domination confirming social inequality. Cognitively, manipulation as mind control involves the interference with processes of understanding, the formation of biased mental models and social representations such as knowledge and ideologies. Discursively, manipulation generally involves the usual forms and formats of ideological discourse, such as emphasizing Our good things, and emphasizing Their bad things. At all these levels of analysis it is shown how manipulation is different from legitimate mind control, such as in persuasion and providing information, for instance by stipulating that manipulation is in the best interest of the dominated group and against the best interests of dominated groups. Finally, this theory is illustrated by a partial analysis of a speech by Tony Blair in the House of Commons legitimating the participation of the UK in the US-led war against Iraq in 2003.

Key Words: Tony Blair • domination • House of Commons • ideologies • Iraq war • knowledge • legitimacy • manipulation • mental models • mind control • parliamentary discourse • persuasion • power abuse • social representations

Discourse & Society, Vol. 17, No. 3, 359-383 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926506060250


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Giles, R. L. Shaw, and W. Morgan Representations of voluntary childlessness in the UK press, 1990--2008 J Health Psychol, November 1, 2009; 14(8): 1218 - 1228. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Iyer Entrepreneurial identities and the problematic of subjectivity in media-mediated discourses Discourse Society, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 241 - 263. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Hobbs Surging ahead to a new way forward: the metaphorical foreshadowing of a policy shift Discourse & Communication, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 29 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Ferrari Metaphor at work in the analysis of political discourse: investigating a `preventive war' persuasion strategy Discourse Society, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 603 - 625. [Abstract] [PDF]