| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0957926505049618 © 2005 SAGE Publications The de-gaying and re-gaying of AIDS: contested homophobias in lesbian and gay awareness trainingUniversity of York, celia_kitzinger{at}yahoo.com
University of Aston, e.a.peel{at}aston.ac.uk From the first recognition of AIDS as a disease, it was publicly conceptualized as a gay plague. In response, health education and diversity training sought to counter this association claiming that AIDS is an equal opportunity virus - that it can affect anyone. In this article, we analyse talk about HIV/AIDS within a data corpus of 13 tape-recorded lesbian and gay awareness training sessions. Counter to the way in which interactions are described in the lesbian and gay awareness training literature, we found that it was trainees, rather than trainers, who pursued discussions about HIV/AIDS, and who did so in order to claim the de-gaying of AIDS, which they treated as representing a non-prejudiced position. By contrast, and in response to trainees insistence on de-gaying AIDS, trainers were re-gaying AIDS. Our analysis highlights that in these sessions - designed explicitly to counter homophobic attitudes - apparently factual claims and counter-claims about infection rates and risk groups are underpinned by essentially contested definitions of what constitutes a homophobic attitude. We conclude by pointing to the value of detailed analysis of talk-in-interaction for understanding professional practices, and suggest strategies for improving the pedagogic value of training.
Key Words: AIDS conversation analysis discourse heterosexism HIV homophobia language lesbian and gay awareness training lesbian and gay psychology prejudice
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
