This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (20) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cook, G. Articles by Robbins, P. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

‘The Scientists Think and the Public Feels’: Expert Perceptions of the Discourse of GM Food

University Of Reading g.cook{at}reading.ac.uk

Elisa Pieri

University Of Reading

Peter T. Robbins

University Of Reading

Debates about new technologies, such as crop and food genetic modification (GM), raise pressing questions about the ways ‘experts’ and ‘ nonexperts’ communicate. These debates are dynamic, characterized by many voices contesting numerous storylines. The discoursal features, including language choices and communication strategies, of the GM debate are in some ways taken for granted and in others actively manipulated by participants. Although there are many voices, some have more influence than others. This study makes use of 50 hours of in-depth interviews with GM scientists, nonexperts, and other stakeholders in the GM debate to examine this phenomenon. We uncover rhetorical devices used by scientists to characterize and ultimately undermine participation by non-experts in areas including rationality, knowledge, understanding and objectivity. Scientists engage with ‘the public’ from their own linguistic and social domain, without reflexive confirmation of their own status as part of the public and the citizenry. This raises a number of interesting ironies and contradictions, which are explored in the article. As such, it provides valuable insights into an increasingly important type of discourse.

Key Words: deficit model • genetic modification • genre • GM • science communication • scientific discourse • scientists

Discourse & Society, Vol. 15, No. 4, 433-449 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926504043708


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Burges Watson, T. Moreira, and M. Murtagh Little bottles and the promise of probiotics Health (London) , March 1, 2009; 13(2): 219 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Davies Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists About Talking to the Public Science Communication, June 1, 2008; 29(4): 413 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Motion and B. Doolin Out of the laboratory: scientists' discursive practices in their encounters with activists Discourse Studies, February 1, 2007; 9(1): 63 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Ponti Transgenic Crops and Sustainable Agriculture in the European Context Bulletin of Science Technology Society, August 1, 2005; 25(4): 289 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]