This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mccann-Mortimer, P. Articles by Lecouteur, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

‘Race’ and the Human Genome Project: Constructions of Scientific Legitimacy

University Of Adelaide patricia.mcann{at}psychology.adelaide.edu.au

Martha Augoustinos

University Of Adelaide martha{at}psychology.adelaide.edu.au

Amanda Lecouteur

University Of Adelaide amanda.lecouteur{at}psychology.adelaide.edu.au

At the public announcement of the completion of a draft map of the human genome (June 2000), Craig Venter, Head of Celera Genomics and chief private scientist involved with the Human Genome Project, claimed that ‘race’ was not a scientifically valid construct. This statement, based on an analysis of the genomes of five people of different ethnicities, has not served to end the considerable discussion and debate surrounding the concept of ‘race’. Using a social constructionist and critical discursive approach, this study analyses text and talk associated with the debate on the scientific validity of the concept ‘race’. Given the problematic and highly contested nature of this concept, the present research examines, closely and in detail, a range of ways in which constructions of truth are worked up in scientific discourse. In particular, we analyse the ways in which empiricist and contingent repertoires within scientific discourse are mobilized to establish and contest claims of objectivity and facticity. We also examinea range of rhetorical devices deployed by protagonists in the debate to warrant particular truth claims including quantification rhetoric and the ‘Truth Will Out Device’ (TWOD). We conclude that despite the promissory representation of the Human Genome Project as having produced scientific evidence to discredit the biological legitimacy of ‘race’, the concept is likely to persist in both popular and scientific usage.

Key Words: critical discourse analysis • genomics discourse • Human Genome Project • race • scientific discourse • sociology of science

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L M Hunt and M S Megyesi Genes, race and research ethics: who's minding the store? J. Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 34(6): 495 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Motion and B. Doolin Out of the laboratory: scientists' discursive practices in their encounters with activists Discourse Studies, February 1, 2007; 9(1): 63 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF]