This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Leudar, I. Articles by Nekvapil, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’and‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse

Victoria Marsland

UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER

Jirí Nekvapil

CHARLES UNIVERSITY

This article concerns the attacks on New York and Washington in September 2001. We use Membership Categorization Analysis to establish how the key figures involved in the conflict represented these events and the participants in them. We analyse public addresses made soon after the attacks by the US President George W. Bush, the British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Osama bin Laden of Al Qaeda. Each speaker distinguished ‘us’ from ‘them’ and formulated this distinction so as to justify past violent actions and to prepare grounds for future ones. Bush and Blair both distinguished ‘us’ from ‘them’ in social, political and moral terms, whereas bin Laden did so in religious terms. The categorizations were not done in isolation from each other, but were instead networked. We discuss the relation between membership categorizations, presentations of happenings and violent actions, prior and subsequent and we extend our concept of a ‘dialogical network’.

Key Words: dialogical networks • membership categorization analysis • violence

Discourse & Society, Vol. 15, No. 2-3, 243-266 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926504041019


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Collet Civilization and civilized in post-9/11 US presidential speeches Discourse Society, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 455 - 475. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Jarvis The Spaces and Faces of Critical Terrorism Studies Security Dialogue, February 1, 2009; 40(1): 5 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. C. Chang and H. B. Mehan Why we must attack Iraq: Bush's reasoning practices and argumentation system Discourse Society, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 453 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Leudar, J. Hayes, J. Nekvapil, and J. Turner Baker Hostility themes in media, community and refugee narratives Discourse Society, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 187 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Fenton-Smith Diplomatic condolences: ideological positioning in the death of Yasser Arafat Discourse Society, November 1, 2007; 18(6): 697 - 718. [Abstract] [PDF]