This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Graham, P. Articles by Dowd, A.-M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Call to Arms at the End of History: A Discourse–Historical Analysis of George W. Bush’s Declaration of War on Terror

Thomas Keenan

Anne-Maree Dowd

UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND

In this article we take a discourse–historical approach to illustrate the significance of George W. Bush’s (2001) declaration of a ‘war on terror’. We present four exemplary ‘call to arms’ speeches by Pope Urban II (1095), Queen Elizabeth I (1588), Adolf Hitler (1938) and George W. Bush (2001) to exemplify the structure, function, and historical significance of such texts in western societies over the last millennium. We identify four generic features that have endured in such texts throughout this period: (i) an appeal to a legitimate power source that is external to the orator, and which is presented as inherently good; (ii) an appeal to the historical importance of the culture in which the discourse is situated; (iii) the construction of a thoroughly evil Other; and (iv) an appeal for unification behind the legitimating external power source. We argue further that such texts typically appear in historical contexts characterized by deep crises in political legitimacy.

Key Words: critical discourse analysis • political discourse • social dynamics • terrorism • warfare

Discourse & Society, Vol. 15, No. 2-3, 199-221 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926504041017


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Collet Civilization and civilized in post-9/11 US presidential speeches Discourse Society, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 455 - 475. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. L. Dunmire `9/11 changed everything': an intertextual analysis of the Bush Doctrine Discourse Society, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 195 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B.-E. M. Mazid Cowboy and misanthrope: a critical (discourse) analysis of Bush and bin Laden cartoons Discourse & Communication, November 1, 2008; 2(4): 433 - 457. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Jaworski and R. Fitzgerald 'This poll has not happened yet': temporal play in election predictions Discourse & Communication, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 5 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Ferrari Metaphor at work in the analysis of political discourse: investigating a `preventive war' persuasion strategy Discourse Society, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 603 - 625. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Erjavec and Z. Volcic The Kosovo Battle: Media's Recontextualization of the Serbian Nationalistic Discourses International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2007; 12(3): 67 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Erjavec and Z. Volcic 'War on terrorism' as a discursive battleground: Serbian recontextualization of G.W. Bush's discourse Discourse Society, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 123 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF]