Discourse & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AUGOUSTINOS, M.
Right arrow Articles by SOYLAND, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Discourse & Society, Vol. 13, No. 1, 105-142 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926502013001005
© 2002 SAGE Publications

Self-sufficient Arguments in Political Rhetoric: Constructing Reconciliation and Apologizing to the Stolen Generations

MARTHA AUGOUSTINOS

UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE martha{at}psychology.adelaide.edu

AMANDA LECOUTEUR

UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE amanda.lecouteur{at}psychology.adelaide.edu.au

JOHN SOYLAND

UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE

This article focuses on the rhetorical and argumentative organization of a major political address by the Prime Minister of Australia on the topics of reconciliation and apologizing to the Stolen Generations of Indigenous peoples. The analysis documents the interpretative repertoires that were mobilized to argue around these sensitive, controversial issues in a public forum, in particular the deployment of discursive formulations of `togetherness', of `culture' and of `nation'. The analysis also demonstrates the ways in which a limited number of rhetorically self-sufficient arguments, identified in recent studies of the language of contemporary racism, was mobilized in this important public speech. We argue that the flexible use of such rhetorically self-sufficient arguments concerning practicality, equality, justice and progress worked to build up a particular version of reconciliation which functions to sustain and legitimate existing inequalities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples in Australia.

Key Words: common-sense • critical discourse analysis • political rhetoric • racism • reconciliation • self-sufficient arguments


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
T. Oteiza and D. Pinto
Agency, responsibility and silence in the construction of contemporary history in Chile and Spain
Discourse Society, May 1, 2008; 19(3): 333 - 358.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
M. Augoustinos and D. Every
The Language of "Race" and Prejudice: A Discourse of Denial, Reason, and Liberal-Practical Politics
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2007; 26(2): 123 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
M. Augoustinos, K. Tuffin, and D. Every
New racism, meritocracy and individualism: constraining affirmative action in education
Discourse Society, May 1, 2005; 16(3): 315 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]