This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by STOKOE, E. H. Articles by SMITHSON, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE WORCESTER

JANET SMITHSON

MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY

In this article, we critically evaluate a conversation analytic approach to the study of the links between gender and language from a feminist perspective. In so doing, we engage in the recent series of exchanges about conversation analysis (CA) and other strands of discourse analysis that have been published in Discourse & Society. We consider talk from two sets of discourse data, focusing on participants' orientation to gender categories as they crop up in the interactions. We suggest that a CA approach produces a rich understanding of the links between discourse and gender. However, we are critical of several, often unexamined aspects and conundrums of conversation analytic methodology. First, we consider the extent to which the `analytic stances' of feminism and conversation analysis are compatible. Second, we question whether, as Schegloff (1997) suggests, it is fruitful to rely on descriptions of and orientations to gender solely in participants' terms, as well as problematizing the notion of `orienting to gender' itself. Finally, while we propose CA is a useful tool for making claims about the relevance of gender in conversational interaction, and that such claims are grounded in speakers' orientations, we suggest that culture and common-sense knowledge, of both members and analysts, are largely unacknowledged and unexplicated resources in CA.

Key Words: conversation analysis • culture • feminism • gender • gender orientations • participants' categories

Discourse & Society, Vol. 12, No. 2, 217-244 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926501012002005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Kitzinger and R. Rickford VI. Becoming a `Bloke': The Construction of Gender in Interaction Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2007; 17(2): 214 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Stockill and C. Kitzinger VII. Gendered `People': How Linguistically Non-gendered Terms Can Have Gendered Interactional Relevance Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2007; 17(2): 224 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Hepburn and S. Wiggins Developments in discursive psychology Discourse Society, September 1, 2005; 16(5): 595 - 601. [PDF]

				M. Makri-Tsilipakou Greek Diminutive Use Problematized: Gender, Culture and Common Sense Discourse Society, November 1, 2003; 14(6): 699 - 726. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hammersley Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: Methods or Paradigms? Discourse Society, November 1, 2003; 14(6): 751 - 781. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Murakami Orientation to the Setting: Discursively Accomplished Intersubjectivity Culture Psychology, September 1, 2003; 9(3): 233 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. TAINIO `When Shall We Go for a Ride?' a Case of the Sexual Harassment of a Young Girl Discourse Society, March 1, 2003; 14(2): 173 - 190. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. TRIX and C. PSENKA Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty Discourse Society, March 1, 2003; 14(2): 191 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Ehrlich Legal institutions, nonspeaking recipiency and participants' orientations Discourse Society, November 1, 2002; 13(6): 731 - 747. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Weatheral Towards understanding gender and talk-in-interaction Discourse Society, November 1, 2002; 13(6): 767 - 781. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Paoletti Caring for older people: a gendered practice Discourse Society, November 1, 2002; 13(6): 805 - 817. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Giles Keeping the public in their place: audience participation in lifestyle television programming Discourse Society, September 1, 2002; 13(5): 603 - 628. [Abstract] [PDF]