Discourse & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AUGOUSTINOS, M.
Right arrow Articles by RAPLEY, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Discourse & Society, Vol. 10, No. 3, 351-378 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0957926599010003004
© 1999 SAGE Publications

Genocide or a Failure to Gel? Racism, History and Nationalism in Australian Talk

MARTHA AUGOUSTINOS

UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE

KEITH TUFFIN

MASSEY UNIVERSITY

MARK RAPLEY

MURDOCH UNIVERSITY

In a context of wide media attention to public debates about the social, political and epistemic entitlements of different groups within Australian society, an understanding of the rhetorical resources and the discursive work doen by differing constructions of `race', has become an important local issue. This article examines data from discussions between two groups of (non-indigenous) university students on a range of contemporary issues concerning race relations in Australia. Participants drew on four common discursive themes when discussing Aboriginal people. These were: an imperialist narrative of Australian history exculpatory of colonialism; an economic-rationalist/neo-liberal discourse of `productivity' and entitlement managing accountability for a contemporary Aboriginal `plight'; a local discourse of balance and even-handedness which discounted the seriousness of discrimination and racism in Australia; and a nationalist discourse stressing the necessity of all members collectively identifying as `Australian'. These interpretative resources are illustrated and discussed in terms of their rhetorical organization and social consequences. The international pervasiveness of a range of modern racist tropes and the local cultural specificity of their working-up are discussed.

Key Words: Australian race relations • discourse analysis • modern racism • ordinary talk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
F. Fozdar
Duelling discourses, shared weapons: rhetorical techniques used to challenge racist arguments
Discourse Society, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 529 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
D. Every and M. Augoustinos
Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers
Discourse Society, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 411 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
F. Tilbury and V. Colic-Peisker
Deflecting responsibility in employer talk about race discrimination
Discourse Society, September 1, 2006; 17(5): 651 - 676.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
M. Augoustinos, K. Tuffin, and D. Every
New racism, meritocracy and individualism: constraining affirmative action in education
Discourse Society, May 1, 2005; 16(3): 315 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
M. Verkuyten and A. deWolf
Being, Feeling and Doing: Discourses and Ethnic Self-Definitions among Minority Group Members
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2002; 8(4): 371 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]